← Back to all comparisons

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Grok 4.6 — Price, Context, and Capability Compared

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Grok 4.6: which should I use?

Gemini 3.1 Pro costs 1.5× more per blended million tokens than Grok 4.6. Gemini 3.1 Pro has the larger context window (2,000,000 tokens). Default to Grok 4.6 unless you specifically need Gemini 3.1 Pro's edge.

Verified 2026-08-14

Task verdict

Best-fit task signals from the published model strengths; this is not a substitute for a controlled benchmark.

FactGemini 3.1 ProGrok 4.6
Best fitWhole-codebase, whole-document, or long-video analysis in a single request.Coding agents, tool-use workflows, and complex knowledge work that need frontier capability at a lower cost.
Reasoning modeAvailableAvailable

Effective workload cost

Modeled for Coding Agent: 20,000 input + 2,000 output tokens per task, 1 turn. This is a workload model, not a provider quote.

FactGemini 3.1 ProGrok 4.6
Coding Agent / task$0.06 (modeled)$0.05 (modeled) (winner)
Input / output rate$2.00 / $12.00 per M$2.00 / $6.00 per M

Speed

Only non-estimated benchmark results are shown as measured.

FactGemini 3.1 ProGrok 4.6
Measured throughput55 tokens/sUnavailable
Time to first token420 msUnavailable

API compatibility

Provider-level wire-format and SDK facts; model-specific parameter differences may still apply.

FactGemini 3.1 ProGrok 4.6
OpenAI SDKNot drop-inUsable
Request shapecontents/parts structure instead of messages; an OpenAI-compatible endpoint exists but only covers a subset of parameters.Full OpenAI chat/completions compatibility — point the openai SDK at api.x.ai and it works unmodified.
StreamingSSE (Gemini streamGenerateContent)SSE (OpenAI delta)

Privacy and retention

Provider policy and residency facts from the verified provider registry. A missing retention policy is not treated as a guarantee.

FactGemini 3.1 ProGrok 4.6
Provider says API data trains modelsNoUnavailable
Published retention periodUnavailableUnavailable
Data residencyGlobal by default; Vertex AI offers selectable regional endpointsUnavailable

Migration effort

Direction is from each displayed model to the other. Effort is derived from provider compatibility and published parameter maps.

FactGemini 3.1 ProGrok 4.6
Move Gemini 3.1 Pro → Grok 4.6config; 2 breaking parameter differencesTarget: Grok 4.6
Move Grok 4.6 → Gemini 3.1 ProSource: Grok 4.6code-change; 1 breaking parameter difference
WhyKeep the `openai` SDK; change `baseURL` and the API key.contents/parts structure instead of messages; an OpenAI-compatible endpoint exists but only covers a subset of parameters.

Spec comparison

Gemini 3.1 ProGrok 4.6
Price (input)$2.00/M$2.00/M
Price (output)$12.00/M$6.00/M
Blended price$4.50/M$3.00/M
Context window2,000,000 tokens500,000 tokens
Max output64,000 tokens64,000 tokens
Modalitiestext, vision, audiotext, vision
Reasoning modeYesYes
Released2026-022026-08
Speed55 t/sNot measured

Cost at scale (3:1 blended)

Tokens / monthGemini 3.1 ProGrok 4.6Delta
1,000,000$4.50$3.00$1.50 (1.5×)
10,000,000$45.00$30.00$15.00 (1.5×)
100,000,000$450.00$300.00$150.00 (1.5×)

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro if…

  • Largest context window of any current model (2M tokens)
  • Native audio and video understanding
  • Google Search grounding
  • Whole-codebase, whole-document, or long-video analysis in a single request.

Choose Grok 4.6 if…

  • xAI’s newest flagship for coding and agents
  • Configurable reasoning for complex tasks
  • Frontier-level capability at $2/$6 per million tokens
  • Coding agents, tool-use workflows, and complex knowledge work that need frontier capability at a lower cost.

Run this exact matchup right now

Send the same prompt to Gemini 3.1 Pro and Grok 4.6 side by side and see the outputs yourself.

Try Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Grok 4.6 Free

FAQ

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro cheaper than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 is cheaper, at $3.00 per million blended tokens vs $4.50 for Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Grok 4.6?

Gemini 3.1 Pro has the larger context window: 2,000,000 tokens vs 500,000.

Can Gemini 3.1 Pro replace Grok 4.6 for coding?

Both are viable for coding. Largest context window of any current model (2M tokens) (Gemini 3.1 Pro) vs xAI’s newest flagship for coding and agents (Grok 4.6) — pick based on which strength matters more for your workload.

Neither of these? See Gemini 3.1 Pro alternatives or Grok 4.6 alternatives.

Related

Gemini 3.1 Pro pricingGrok 4.6 pricingvs Claude Opus 4.8vs Claude Sonnet 5vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Grok 4.3Premium model tests

Pricing verified 2026-04-06. Specs verified 2026-08-14.